The careers of two footballers were derailed yesterday. Israel Folau’s $4 million contract was torn up and Jack de Belin failed in his attempt to overturn the NRL stand-down ban.
The legal fees in both cases were crippling and have to be paid by the players.
My original opinions that both actions were misconceived were proven right, and although there are further legal options available to both players, I don’t think the odds are in their favour. Further financial damage is guaranteed.
Let’s talk about both cases.
Israel Folau
This is another example of how the law and religious beliefs do not mix. The guy is a true believer and I am sure other people of his persuasion feel obliged to tell the world that according to the scriptures our civilisation is on the way to rack and ruin. I get that and hear it from the Jehovah’s Witnesses who knock on my door.

The top 50 NRL players of 2018: 40-31
Monday October 15, 2018

In the second part of my series running through the top 50 players in the NRL, we move through players 40-31 on the list, with more big changes from the start of the year. » Part 1 (50-41) 40. Anthony Milford (Brisbane Broncos) Rank at start of season: 12 Milford has taken one of the […]

The post The top 50 NRL players of 2018: 40-31 appeared first on M88cvf - Link vao m88 - keom88.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

Thursday January 01, 1970

But here’s the catch: having signed a $4 million contract with the Rugby Australia, who advised him the following:

Would Mark Taylor have made a good CA chairman?
Saturday November 03, 2018

Malcolm Speed, former CEO of Cricket Australia, has suggested Mark Taylor take over as chairman from David Peever. Taylor ruled himself out of any such position but it made me wonder – what sort of Cricket Australia chairman would he have made? Like most cricket fans, I loved Taylor as a player and a captain. […]

The post Would Mark Taylor have made a good CA chairman? appeared first on M88cvf - Link vao m88 - keom88.

To tell us via social media that unless we repent our sins, hell will await us?
To leave Rugby Australia with no alternative but to try to mollify its sponsors by taking action against him?
To keep telling us this is freedom of speech and not a contract problem?
To pay a ridiculous amount in legal fees in a fruitless attempt to have the code of conduct decision overturned?

If he did this off his own bat, he made a huge mistake. If he received advice and acted upon it, he should change his advisers. They will destroy what is left of his career and his financial future.
The whole appeal was misconceived and had no chance.
Advice: take the punishment, shut up and try to continue your sporting career elsewhere.
Israel Folau (Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)
Jack de Belin
Israel Folau’s excuse was his faith calling on him tell the world they must repent or else. Jack had no excuse. He was charged with a terrible crime and rightly or wrongly the rugby league community thought something must be done.
The NRL responded by passing a rule standing him down on full pay until his trial in about 12 months.
What loss did he suffer? His advisers tried to tell the Federal Court that his reputation has suffered by the stand down. This is correct, but he is subject to a terrible charge. Surely that affected his reputation more.
The NRL had to do something to tell their stakeholders they have the interests of the game at heart, so they decided that they wouldn’t let Jack play while he is awaiting his trial. Their argument is reasonable. Jack’s argument is as weak as water.
He lost and had to pay the other side’s legal costs as well.
Again, I need to ask: did these proceedings have a more than a 50 per cent chance of succeeding? My feeling is no given there was a pending charge and he was still being paid.
So many hundreds of thousands of dollars later and where is Jack? He’s in the same place as he was at the start.
Advice: pay the lawyers and start preparing for your criminal trial.